You say something about that in your text Technology, religion, and their victims. Could we relate it somehow with what you say regarding art, religion, and science, if we think about the issue of the object, placed in its dignity by art, but foreclosed by science and displaced by religion?

Eric Laurent, in The Reverse of Biopolitics, states that “the social nominations of what victimizes the body highlight that which is beyond the individual and should not be reduced to a personal signification of jouissance.” That is, not every victim participates in his/her misfortune. So, how can we think about this in relation to the issue of violence against women?

In relation to this series that you just placed—childhood, madness, and that which is feminine—as places where segregation and violence operate in a more drastic way, you have also reflected on the effect of identification regarding that which is media-related and that which is epidemic. Could we also locate in that series poverty sectors of countries where the subjects are reduced to pure body, in subhuman conditions, especially in countries of the third world?

In our country, Argentina, although surely in many other countries this can also be seen, there are lynchings and people taking the law into their own hands against people who commit crimes. This is in the media’s agenda under the motto of doing justice. Then, if we follow Lacan’s postulates on the sacrifice to the gods with respect to opaque jouissance and its segregative effects, how can we think about this phenomenon from psychoanalysis?